Berg et al. (2012), British Journal of Management

Changing Leadership and Gender in Public Sector Organizations

Mostly drawing on the literature, plus some findings from Swedish and English higher education and social work, the authors argue new public management goes with masculinist rationality that rewards individual winners and diverts attention from collective gender issues.

Parts of the Loop it informs

The middle's own weatherSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice by independent reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Related studies

Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.Huy et al. (2014)Over three years of a radical change, middle managers went from supporting their top leaders to mutiny as they reassessed whether those leaders were legitimate, and their emotional reactions fed rising resistance.Vuori & Huy (2016)At Nokia, fearful middle managers shared less bad news upward while top managers did not fully reveal how serious the outside threat was; leaders grew overly optimistic and the smartphone effort suffered.Hassard et al. (2012)Interviews with HR managers in large firms in Japan, the UK and the USA found most had downsized and delayered, promotions were scarcer and sideways moves more common, and middle managers were generally resentful.