Ou et al. (2017), Academy of Management Journal

When Can Humble Top Executives Retain Middle Managers? The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Faultlines

Across 43 top teams, humble executives' link to satisfied middle managers was weaker when the top team was split by faultlines, and those faultlines also blunted how much dissatisfaction pushed managers to quit.

Parts of the Loop it informs

The middle's own weatherSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice by independent reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Related studies

Vuori & Huy (2016)At Nokia, fearful middle managers shared less bad news upward while top managers did not fully reveal how serious the outside threat was; leaders grew overly optimistic and the smartphone effort suffered.Huy et al. (2014)Over three years of a radical change, middle managers went from supporting their top leaders to mutiny as they reassessed whether those leaders were legitimate, and their emotional reactions fed rising resistance.Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.Azambuja & Islam (2019)Middle managers at a Brazilian accounting firm saw themselves as proactive, reflective agents yet also as lacking autonomy and belonging, and routinely shifted between active mediators and mere coordination devices.