Courpasson et al. (2017), Human Relations

Politics of place: The meaningfulness of resisting places

In two cases, middle managers took over and reshaped particular physical places, and the meaning they gave those places helped them build resistance to management policies and decisions.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Surface both waysMixed Start it close to the workChallenges

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice by independent AI reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Questions this study helps answer

What the research saysWhy do middle managers resist change?

Related studies

Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.den Nieuwenboer et al. (2017)Facing performance obstacles in a telecom desk-sales unit, middle managers coerced their reps into deceiving upper management, so the unit's reported results were not real.Currie et al. (2015)In hospital care for older people, nurse middle managers could pass knowledge down to fellow nurses but struggled to pass it up the hierarchy or across to doctors; without HR support, the authors warn, a 'broken' rather than 'broker' chain may result.Ahearne et al. (2014)Middle managers' influence on those above them related to unit performance along a curve rather than a straight line, and it paid off more for managers with a strong reputation in their networks.