Gong et al. (2009), Journal of Applied Psychology

Human resources management and firm performance: The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment.

In 463 firms operating in China, HR practices aimed at middle managers' performance went with better firm results, a link running through managers' emotional attachment to the firm; practices aimed at keeping them did not.

Parts of the Loop it informs

The middle's own weatherSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the abstract and a summary of the paper, then checked twice by independent AI reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Questions this study helps answer

What the research saysDo middle managers affect performance?

Related studies

Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.Huy et al. (2014)Over three years of a radical change, middle managers went from supporting their top leaders to mutiny as they reassessed whether those leaders were legitimate, and their emotional reactions fed rising resistance.Vuori & Huy (2016)At Nokia, fearful middle managers shared less bad news upward while top managers did not fully reveal how serious the outside threat was; leaders grew overly optimistic and the smartphone effort suffered.Fu et al. (2010)In Chinese firms, middle managers picked up on their CEO's personal values, and a CEO's inspiring behavior went with stronger commitment when the CEO cared about others and weaker commitment when the CEO was self-focused.