Pappas & Wooldridge (2007), Journal of Management Studies

Middle Managers' Divergent Strategic Activity: An Investigation of Multiple Measures of Network Centrality

Among 89 mid-level managers at a U.S. urban hospital, different kinds of network centrality were tied to different parts of strategic renewal, and managers who spanned boundaries were more strategically active.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Not tied to one part of the Loop. It describes the middle more broadly.

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice by independent AI reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Questions this study helps answer

What the research saysDo middle managers' networks matter for change?

Related studies

Logan & Ganster (2007)At a large trucking company, a randomized empowerment program raised unit managers' sense of control only where they felt their own bosses backed them, and it also lifted their units' measured performance.Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.Huy et al. (2014)Over three years of a radical change, middle managers went from supporting their top leaders to mutiny as they reassessed whether those leaders were legitimate, and their emotional reactions fed rising resistance.Vuori & Huy (2016)At Nokia, fearful middle managers shared less bad news upward while top managers did not fully reveal how serious the outside threat was; leaders grew overly optimistic and the smartphone effort suffered.