Rasins et al. (2007), Organization Development Journal

A Systemic Approach to Career Development at McDonald's.

McDonald's USA let a representative group of its own middle managers design changes to their career paths, with top leaders sponsoring; the authors report 3,000 middle managers embraced it.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Start it close to the workSupports

Find the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice by independent AI reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Questions this study helps answer

What the research saysShould change be top-down or bottom-up?

Related studies

Logan & Ganster (2007)At a large trucking company, a randomized empowerment program raised unit managers' sense of control only where they felt their own bosses backed them, and it also lifted their units' measured performance.Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.Huy et al. (2014)Over three years of a radical change, middle managers went from supporting their top leaders to mutiny as they reassessed whether those leaders were legitimate, and their emotional reactions fed rising resistance.Mantere (2008)Drawing on 262 interviews, Mantere argues the same role expectations can both free and limit middle managers' strategic action, depending on enabling conditions he identifies for each of four strategic roles.