Thakur & Srivastava (2018), Journal of Organizational Change Management

From resistance to readiness: the role of mediating variables

In a survey of 276 Indian middle managers, trust, felt organizational support and emotional attachment to the organization helped explain the link between resistance and readiness to change, narrowing the gap between the two.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Start it close to the workSupports The middle's own weatherSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice by independent AI reviewers against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and AI-assisted, pending human verification. Spot an error? Email info@unfreeze.us and it gets fixed.

Questions this study helps answer

What the research saysWhy do middle managers resist change?What the research saysDoes trust in leaders matter during change?

Related studies

Huy et al. (2014)Over three years of a radical change, middle managers went from supporting their top leaders to mutiny as they reassessed whether those leaders were legitimate, and their emotional reactions fed rising resistance.Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.Azambuja & Islam (2019)Middle managers at a Brazilian accounting firm saw themselves as proactive, reflective agents yet also as lacking autonomy and belonging, and routinely shifted between active mediators and mere coordination devices.Chen et al. (2018)In 113 Chinese manufacturing firms, high-commitment HR systems went with more innovative middle managers, but heavy work-family conflict weakened that link, less so where the climate made it easier to share family concerns.